Regional Talent Hubs

The local solution to a national workforce crisis

America’s workforce challenges won’t be solved with fragmented talent initiatives. inSpring’s Regional Talent Hubs brings a systems approach, connecting talent, training, and industry to create sustainable, high-impact workforce programs at the local level.

inSpring has been selected by the Talent Mobility Fund to build and scale Regional Talent Hubs across the country—and we’re looking for our next hub.

Apply here

The Challenge

Where is all the skilled talent?

The US is facing a skilled labor shortage with dire implications for our future at a time when staying competitive in critical industries is on the line.

So what’s the deal?

Aging workforce

An aging population means fewer workers and slower innovation. Soon, one in five Americans will be 65 or older.[1]

Demographic cliff

The US fertility rate has been on the decline in all states. As a result, the number of high school graduates peaks in 2025, followed by a 15-year decline, just as high-skilled talent become more critical for the workforce.[2]

Higher-skilled demand

Due to technological advancements, the US economy relies more heavily on skilled labor. In the 1970s, less than 30% of jobs required an advanced degree—today, that’s 68%, and by 2031, 72%.[3]

Data-Driven Impact

International talent is an untapped solution

International talent is responsible for 88% of the labor force growth in America since 2019. Skilled, US-educated international graduates are ready to work in your region, yet compliance barriers and employer readiness cause many to leave. inSpring has access to the largest network of international graduates and provides the support organizations needed to retain them in the regional workforce.

1.1 Million

International students already in the US

56%

in STEM fields

73%

want to stay and work
after graduation

43 States

are experiencing international student growth

The Solution

We’re not just filling jobs. We’re building a workforce infrastructure.

inSpring activates Regional Talent Hubs that connect job-ready talent with local employers to deliver scalable, end-to-end workforce solutions. Integrating with existing backbone organizations, each hub creates a talent ecosystem tailored to local industry needs.

Backed by proprietary data on labor trends, census insights, and 20 years of talent mobility data, inSpring knows how to intentionally match talent to roles—all while managing workforce planning, training, and compliance to ensure talent not only arrives but stays.

Invest in talent

Boost productivity

Drive economic return

Everyone wins

How we work

Talent

We leverage our national university network to identify, prepare, and mobilize talent from relevant degree programs into skilled roles to support your local workforce.

Industry-Specific Training + Development Programs

We create industry-specific Centers of Excellence to train and assess talent with the technical and professional skills needed to stay and grow in the most in-demand roles.

Sustainable, Retention-Focused Outcomes

We strengthen each region’s long-term talent strategy by continuing to invest in talent pipeline programs and building career pathways alongside employers to ensure workforce retention.

Ready to Launch a Hub?

Our Partnership

in partnership with

The Talent Mobility Fund empowers individuals to move to opportunity by leveraging existing legal pathways. With support from TMF’s US STEM program, inSpring is enhancing and expanding Regional Talent Hubs to address the demand for geographically mobile, skilled talent.

“At TMF, we believe that a key to strengthening and sustaining America’s STEM ecosystem is recognizing and leveraging the talent already within our reach...inSpring’s regional hub model exemplifies this approach—bridging gaps between employers, STEM talent, and regional communities.”

- Amy Nice, Co-Director of the Talent Mobility Fund and Head of U.S. STEM Immigration

Future Hubs

We’re selecting our future talent hubs. Your region could be next.

Retaining your regionally educated talent isn’t just smart—it’s essential. Graduates here could grow the economy by $233 billion over the next decade.[4] Backed by the Talent Mobility Fund, we’re accepting applications from regions ready to bring the Regional Talent Hub infrastructure to their ecosystem, investing in building long-term infrastructure that strengthens their workforce and unlocks economic opportunity.

Is your region workforce ready?

Explore this interactive map of the worker shortage crisis in each state. Data is from December 2024.[5]

New York
New York

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

New York
New York

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

West Virginia
West Virginia

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

West Virginia
West Virginia

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Washington
Washington

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Washington
Washington

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Wyoming
Wyoming

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Wyoming
Wyoming

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Wisconsin
Wisconsin

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Wisconsin
Wisconsin

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Virginia
Virginia

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Virginia
Virginia

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Utah
Utah

Facere quia error c

Utah
Utah

Facere quia error c

Vermont
Vermont

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Vermont
Vermont

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Texas
Texas

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Texas
Texas

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Tennessee
Tennessee

Facere quia error c

Tennessee
Tennessee

Facere quia error c

Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Oregon
Oregon

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Oregon
Oregon

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

South Carolina
South Carolina

Facere quia error c

South Carolina
South Carolina

Facere quia error c

South Dakota
South Dakota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

South Dakota
South Dakota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Rhode Island
Rhode Island

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Rhode Island
Rhode Island

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Oklahoma
Oklahoma

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Oklahoma
Oklahoma

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

North Dakota
North Dakota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

North Dakota
North Dakota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

North Carolina
North Carolina

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

North Carolina
North Carolina

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Ohio
Ohio

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Ohio
Ohio

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

New Mexico
New Mexico

Facere quia error c

New Mexico
New Mexico

Facere quia error c

New Jersey
New Jersey

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

New Jersey
New Jersey

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Nevada
Nevada

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Nevada
Nevada

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

New Hampshire
New Hampshire

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

New Hampshire
New Hampshire

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Nebraska
Nebraska

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Nebraska
Nebraska

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Michigan
Michigan

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Michigan
Michigan

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Montana
Montana

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Montana
Montana

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Missouri
Missouri

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Missouri
Missouri

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Mississippi
Mississippi

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Mississippi
Mississippi

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Maine
Maine

Facere quia error c

Maine
Maine

Facere quia error c

Minnesota
Minnesota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Minnesota
Minnesota

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Maryland
Maryland

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Maryland
Maryland

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Massachusetts
Massachusetts

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Massachusetts
Massachusetts

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Illinois
Illinois

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Illinois
Illinois

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Louisiana
Louisiana

Facere quia error c

Louisiana
Louisiana

Facere quia error c

Kentucky
Kentucky

Facere quia error c

Kentucky
Kentucky

Facere quia error c

Kansas
Kansas

Facere quia error c

Kansas
Kansas

Facere quia error c

Iowa
Iowa

Facere quia error c

Iowa
Iowa

Facere quia error c

Indiana
Indiana

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Indiana
Indiana

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Idaho
Idaho

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Idaho
Idaho

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Hawaii
Hawaii

Facere quia error c

Hawaii
Hawaii

Facere quia error c

Delaware
Delaware

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Delaware
Delaware

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Georgia
Georgia

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Georgia
Georgia

Ducimus ipsam eum sit ut praesentium fugit pariatur odit. Rerum nihil qui ni

Alaska
Alaska

Facere quia error c

Alaska
Alaska

Facere quia error c

Connecticut
Connecticut

Facere quia error c

Connecticut
Connecticut

Facere quia error c

Florida
Florida

Facere quia error c

Florida
Florida

Facere quia error c

Arkansas
Arkansas

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Arkansas
Arkansas

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Colorado
Colorado

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Colorado
Colorado

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Arizona
Arizona

Facere quia error c

Arizona
Arizona

Facere quia error c

California
California

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

California
California

Asperiores ut soluta deserunt dolor iure vel aliquid fuga. Autem amet voluptatibus dolore

Alabama
Alabama

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Alabama
Alabama

Et officia nobis animi dicta. Itaque et enim. Aliquam harum quod laborum eos

Least Severe

Severe

More Severe

Most Severe

Alabama

57 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.57

Alabama Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 135,000

Unemployed Workers: 77,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 57.7

Unemployment Rate: 3.3

Quit Rate: 2.3

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

Alaska

70 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.7

Alaska Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 24,000

Unemployed Workers: 17,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 64.9

Unemployment Rate: 4.7

Quit Rate: 3.8

Hiring Rate: 5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Arizona

75 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.75

Arizona Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 190,000

Unemployed Workers: 143,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 61.7

Unemployment Rate: 3.8

Quit Rate: 1.7

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Arkansas

55 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.55

Arkansas Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 87,000

Unemployed Workers: 48,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 58.2

Unemployment Rate: 3.4

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

California

147 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.47

California Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 724,000

Unemployed Workers: 1,061,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.1

Unemployment Rate: 5.5

Quit Rate: 1.7

Hiring Rate: 2.9

Apply for a Talent Hub

Colorado

87 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.87

Colorado Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 166,000

Unemployed Workers: 144,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 67.9

Unemployment Rate: 4.4

Quit Rate: 2.4

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Connecticut

77 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.77

Connecticut Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 75,000

Unemployed Workers: 57,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 64.4

Unemployment Rate: 3

Quit Rate: 1.6

Hiring Rate: 2.9

Apply for a Talent Hub

Delaware

65 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.65

Delaware Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 29,000

Unemployed Workers: 19,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 59

Unemployment Rate: 3.7

Quit Rate: 2.5

Hiring Rate: 3.7

Apply for a Talent Hub

Florida

71 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.71

Florida Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 532,000

Unemployed Workers: 377,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 58

Unemployment Rate: 3.4

Quit Rate: 2.5

Hiring Rate: 3.4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Georgia

65 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.65

Georgia Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 304,000

Unemployed Workers: 198,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 61.5

Unemployment Rate: 3.7

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.7

Apply for a Talent Hub

Hawaii

71 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.71

Hawaii Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 28,000

Unemployed Workers: 20,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 59.9

Unemployment Rate: 3

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3.3

Apply for a Talent Hub

Idaho

82 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.82

Idaho Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 46,000

Unemployed Workers: 38,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63.6

Unemployment Rate: 3.8

Quit Rate: 2.7

Hiring Rate: 4.1

Apply for a Talent Hub

Illinois

120 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.2

Illinois Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 283,000

Unemployed Workers: 340,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 65.2

Unemployment Rate: 5.2

Quit Rate: 1.6

Hiring Rate: 3.4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Indiana

94 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.94

Indiana Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 165,000

Unemployed Workers: 155,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63.5

Unemployment Rate: 4.5

Quit Rate: 2.6

Hiring Rate: 4.3

Apply for a Talent Hub

Iowa

77 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.77

Iowa Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 70,000

Unemployed Workers: 54,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 66.4

Unemployment Rate: 3.2

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Kansas

72 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.72

Kansas Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 77,000

Unemployed Workers: 56,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 66.7

Unemployment Rate: 3.6

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Kentucky

71 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.71

Kentucky Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 152,000

Unemployed Workers: 109,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 58.3

Unemployment Rate: 5.2

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Louisiana

77 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.77

Louisiana Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 118,000

Unemployed Workers: 91,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 58.4

Unemployment Rate: 4.4

Quit Rate: 2.3

Hiring Rate: 4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Maine

71 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.71

Maine Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 32,000

Unemployed Workers: 23,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 60.2

Unemployment Rate: 3.2

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 3.7

Apply for a Talent Hub

Maryland

60 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.6

Maryland Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 167,000

Unemployed Workers: 100,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 65.6

Unemployment Rate: 3.1

Quit Rate: 1.9

Hiring Rate: 3.3

Apply for a Talent Hub

Massachusetts

85 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.85

Massachusetts Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 187,000

Unemployed Workers: 159,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 66.5

Unemployment Rate: 4.1

Quit Rate: 1.4

Hiring Rate: 3.2

Apply for a Talent Hub

Michigan

115 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.15

Michigan Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 218,000

Unemployed Workers: 252,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.2

Unemployment Rate: 5

Quit Rate: 1.9

Hiring Rate: 3.4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Minnesota

59 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.59

Minnesota Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 174,000

Unemployed Workers: 103,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 67.8

Unemployment Rate: 3.3

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 3.2

Apply for a Talent Hub

Mississippi

60 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.6

Mississippi Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 71,000

Unemployed Workers: 42,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 55.3

Unemployment Rate: 3.3

Quit Rate: 2.3

Hiring Rate: 3.8

Apply for a Talent Hub

Missouri

62 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.62

Missouri Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 186,000

Unemployed Workers: 116,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63.9

Unemployment Rate: 3.7

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Montana

55 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.55

Montana Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 33,000

Unemployed Workers: 18,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.6

Unemployment Rate: 3.1

Quit Rate: 3

Hiring Rate: 4.8

Apply for a Talent Hub

Nebraska

57 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.57

Nebraska Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 53,000

Unemployed Workers: 30,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 68.5

Unemployment Rate: 2.8

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

Nevada

118 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.18

Nevada Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 79,000

Unemployed Workers: 93,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.6

Unemployment Rate: 5.7

Quit Rate: 2.3

Hiring Rate: 4.3

Apply for a Talent Hub

New Hampshire

63 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.63

New Hampshire Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 32,000

Unemployed Workers: 20,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 65.8

Unemployment Rate: 2.6

Quit Rate: 1.5

Hiring Rate: 3.5

Apply for a Talent Hub

New Jersey

115 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.15

New Jersey Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 193,000

Unemployed Workers: 222,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 64.4

Unemployment Rate: 4.6

Quit Rate: 1.4

Hiring Rate: 3

Apply for a Talent Hub

New Mexico

77 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.77

New Mexico Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 56,000

Unemployed Workers: 43,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 57.7

Unemployment Rate: 4.4

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.8

Apply for a Talent Hub

New York

94 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.94

New York Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 451,000

Unemployed Workers: 424,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 61.2

Unemployment Rate: 4.4

Quit Rate: 1.4

Hiring Rate: 3

Apply for a Talent Hub

North Carolina

60 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.6

North Carolina Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 328,000

Unemployed Workers: 197,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 59.9

Unemployment Rate: 3.7

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

North Dakota

41 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.41

North Dakota Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 25,000

Unemployed Workers: 10,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 69

Unemployment Rate: 2.5

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Ohio

87 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.87

Ohio Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 298,000

Unemployed Workers: 258,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.6

Unemployment Rate: 4.4

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3

Apply for a Talent Hub

Oklahoma

59 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.59

Oklahoma Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 110,000

Unemployed Workers: 65,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 62.8

Unemployment Rate: 3.3

Quit Rate: 2.4

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

Oregon

89 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.89

Oregon Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 102,000

Unemployed Workers: 90,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63

Unemployment Rate: 4.1

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.6

Apply for a Talent Hub

Pennsylvania

95 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.95

Pennsylvania Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 246,000

Unemployed Workers: 233,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 61.8

Unemployment Rate: 3.6

Quit Rate: 1.7

Hiring Rate: 3.1

Apply for a Talent Hub

Rhode Island

105 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.05

Rhode Island Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 26,000

Unemployed Workers: 27,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 64.6

Unemployment Rate: 4.6

Quit Rate: 1.7

Hiring Rate: 3.9

Apply for a Talent Hub

South Carolina

79 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.79

South Carolina Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 152,000

Unemployed Workers: 119,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 57.5

Unemployment Rate: 4.7

Quit Rate: 2.3

Hiring Rate: 4

Apply for a Talent Hub

South Dakota

38 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.38

South Dakota Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 24,000

Unemployed Workers: 9,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 67.7

Unemployment Rate: 1.9

Quit Rate: 2.1

Hiring Rate: 3.9

Apply for a Talent Hub

Tennessee

75 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.75

Tennessee Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 165,000

Unemployed Workers: 123,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 59.4

Unemployment Rate: 3.6

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.1

Apply for a Talent Hub

Texas

97 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.97

Texas Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 673,000

Unemployed Workers: 654,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 64.7

Unemployment Rate: 4.2

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 2.9

Apply for a Talent Hub

Utah

71 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.71

Utah Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 88,000

Unemployed Workers: 63,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 68.2

Unemployment Rate: 3.5

Quit Rate: 2

Hiring Rate: 3.8

Apply for a Talent Hub

Vermont

62 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.62

Vermont Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 14,000

Unemployed Workers: 9,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 65.5

Unemployment Rate: 2.4

Quit Rate: 2.2

Hiring Rate: 3.8

Apply for a Talent Hub

Virginia

46 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.46

Virginia Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 295,000

Unemployed Workers: 137,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 66

Unemployment Rate: 3

Quit Rate: 2.1

Hiring Rate: 3.4

Apply for a Talent Hub

Washington

111 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

1.11

Washington Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 163,000

Unemployed Workers: 181,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63

Unemployment Rate: 4.5

Quit Rate: 1.7

Hiring Rate: 3.1

Apply for a Talent Hub

West Virginia

62 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.62

West Virginia Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 53,000

Unemployed Workers: 33,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 54.8

Unemployment Rate: 4.2

Quit Rate: 2.8

Hiring Rate: 4.2

Apply for a Talent Hub

Wisconsin

65 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.65

Wisconsin Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 145,000

Unemployed Workers: 94,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 65.9

Unemployment Rate: 3

Quit Rate: 1.8

Hiring Rate: 3.3

Apply for a Talent Hub

Wyoming

61 available workers for every 100 open jobs.

0.61

Wyoming Worker Shortage Index

Job Openings: 17,000

Unemployed Workers: 10,000

Labor Force Participation Rate: 63.2

Unemployment Rate: 3.5

Quit Rate: 3.7

Hiring Rate: 5

Apply for a Talent Hub

Existing Hubs

Where we’re working

inSpring has launched hubs in five regions, with plans to scale to 30+ hubs over the next decade.

Oklahoma City, OK

Healthcare and energy sector workforce solutions with Oklahoma City University and Devon Energy.

Columbia, SC

Life sciences talent pipeline program with Benedict College and Ritedose Corporation.

Rochester, NY

Advanced manufacturing and healthcare workforce programs with Greater Rochester Chamber of Commerce.

Birmingham, AL

Tech and advanced manufacturing workforce development in partnership with TechBirmingham.

Rutland & Randolph Counties, VT

Global nurse pipeline programs supporting healthcare systems like Gifford Hospital and Rutland Regional Healthcare.

Case Studies

Employer Excellence: Ritedose engages international students the right way

Employer Excellence: Ritedose engages international students the right way

View Case Study

Ritedose Corporation, a rapidly growing pharmaceutical manufacturer in Columbia, SC, partnered with inSpring and Benedict College to launch the RISE Program, a workforce initiative connecting international STEM students with high-demand entry-level roles.

Faced with industry-wide labor shortages and high turnover rates, Ritedose developed RISE to provide a nurturing, long-term employment pathway that complements the culture of both the company and Benedict College, a local HBCU.

inSpring supports the program by managing compliance logistics and talent onboarding, allowing Ritedose to focus on growth and retention. Participants receive mentorship, ongoing development, and tuition reimbursement, resulting in five-year employee commitments without visa sponsorship. RISE not only addresses talent gaps but enriches company culture with the global perspectives of its international hires, serving as a replicable model for other mid-sized employers.

“RISE creates a win-win situation. Students help us address critical workforce needs, and we provide them the tools and opportunities to advance their careers.”

– Janisha Thomas, Ritedose Chief Human Resource Officer

Candidate Success: Harshith’s journey to the energy sector in Birmingham, AL

Candidate Success: Harshith’s journey to the energy sector in Birmingham, AL

View Case Study

Harshith Kadaiah Gowda is an international graduate of the University of Alabama at Birmingham who has successfully made the transition from education to employment. According to Harshith, the most challenging part of his education abroad journey was not earning his master’s degree—it was finding a job. To support him through this challenging process, Harshith participated in a customized pre-hire onboarding program focused on the energy sector, organized by inSpring and Diversified Energy Co.

After completing the program, Harshith landed a position as a SCADA Analyst with Diversified Energy, which has been extremely supportive throughout the OPT hiring process, and committed to long-term retention and career growth. Harshith’s experience sheds light on the common challenges that international students encounter while seeking employment in the U.S. and highlights the critical role of targeted training programs to help build the confidence and skills to be job-ready.

The talent is here.
Let’s put it to work.

Our model works because we do it together. Through powerful partnerships, we can build a stronger workforce.

Connect with us